Outside-In and Inside-Out Perspectives

An Analysis of ESG’s Social Dimension in Indonesian Air Navigation Company

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.27.2.153-164

Keywords:

Inside–out, materiality, outside–in, social dimension, social accounting, sustainability reporting

Abstract

The increasing quality issues of sustainability reports in general include several important aspects that can affect the credibility and usefulness of the report. In this context, the materiality of information enhances the relevance and transparency of the company's disclosures. This study examines the implementation of social materiality perspectives at the Indonesian Air Navigation Company within the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) principles framework by integrating the outside-in and inside-out perspectives. Utilizing a materiality perspective, this research supports organizations in preparing disclosures of essential information within sustainability reports. The research uses a qualitative method, utilizing document review and semi-structured interviews with key stakeholders to explore ways to disclose outside-in and inside-out perspectives with sustainability reporting. The findings show that integrating social components into a company's ESG framework highlights its approach to materiality. The company measures its operational activities against various external requirements, embodying an outside-in perspective that reflects how external factors affect its operations. The company's materiality is in line with the outside-in perspective that takes into account investor considerations and financial risks; this also shows the use of the POJK 51 / POJK.03 / 2017 framework to adjust to the company's needs. Meanwhile, the company continues to allocate resources for social initiatives that improve stakeholder welfare, which represents an inside-out materiality perspective where internal capabilities are utilized to overcome operational pressures.

References

Abeysekera, I. (2022). A Framework for Sustainability Reporting. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 13(6), 1386-1409.

Almandoz, J. (2023). Inside-Out and Outside-In Perspectives on Corporate Purpose. Strategy science, 8(2), 139-148

Anis, I., & Avrilia, V. (2024). Analyzing Impact of ESG Principles on Performance: A Perspective from Sustainability Balanced Scorecard. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 21(1), 5.

Baumüller, J., & Sopp, K. (2021). Double Materiality and the Shift from Non-Financial to European Sustainability Reporting: Review, Outlook, and Implications. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 23(1), 8-28.

Becchetti, L., Bobbio, E., Prizia, F., & Semplici, L. (2022). Going Deeper into the S of ESG: A Relational Approach to the Definition of Social Responsibility. Sustainability, 14(15), 9668. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14159668.

Bose, S. (2020). Evolution of ESG Reporting Frameworks. In: Values at Work. Palgrave Mamillan, Cham, 13–33. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-55613-6.

Bossut, M., Jürgens, I., Pioch, T., Schiemann, F., Spandel, T., & Tietmeyer, R. (2021). What Information is Relevant for Sustainability Reporting? The Concept of Materiality and the EU Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive. Sustainable Finance Research Platform. Policy Brief–7/2021.

Brewster, R. (2022). Enabling ESG Accountability: Focusing on the Corporate Enterprise. Wis. L. Rev., 1367.

Christensen, H. B., Hail, L., & Leuz, C. (2021). Mandatory CSR and Sustainability Reporting: Economic Analysis and Literature Review. Review of Accounting Studies, 26(3), 1176-1248.

CNBC Indonesia. (2023). Kabar Buruk! Pekerjaan “Berkualitas” di RI Terus Turun. Retrieved April 5, 2024. Https://Www.Cnbcindonesia.Com/News/20230221064619-4-415482/Kabar-Buruk-Pekerjaan-Berkualitas-Di-Ri-Terus-Turun

Cooper, S., & Michelon, G. (2022). Conceptions of Materiality in Sustainability Reporting Frameworks: Commonalities, Differences and Possibilities. In Handbook of Accounting and Sustainability, 44-66. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Crawford, B., & Baid, C. (2022). A Roadmap for Using the GRI for Societal Impact Reporting. Seidman Business Review, 28(1), 8.

Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational Research, Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Sage Publications.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications.

De Cristofaro, T., & Gulluscio, C. (2023). In Search of Double Materiality in Non-Financial Reports: First Empirical Evidence. Sustainability, 15(2), 924.

Doddaullarthi Basavaraj, C., & Jaya Prakash, S. K. (2024). What Drives Social Accounting Research? Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis. Environmental Quality Management, 34(2), e22317.

Dwiharto, A., Irmaningsih, E. S., Nawangsari, L. C., Lo, S. J., & Zainal, V. R. (2023). The Answer Social Challenges: Social Accounting and Social Accounting Measurement. International Journal of Social Service and Research, 3(1), 82-91.

Ekaputri, C. W., & Eriandani, R. (2022). Pengaruh Corporate Governance Terhadap Kualitas Sustainability Reporting. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 72-86.

Fairuzi, A., & Tjahjadi, B. (2022). Women Directors and Firm Profitability: The Role of Corporate Environmental Responsibility Engagement. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 24(2), 106-116.

Ferreira-Quilice, T., Hernández-Maestro, R. M., & Duarte, R. G. (2023). Corporate Sustainability Transitions: Are There Differences Between What Companies Say and Do and What ESG Ratings Say Companies Do? Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, 137520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137520

Freiberg, D., Rogers, J., & Serafeim, G. (2020). How ESG Issues Become Financially Material to Corporations and Their Investors. Harvard Business School Accounting & Management Unit Working Paper, 20-056. Harvard Business School.

Garst, J., Maas, K., & Suijs, J. (2022). Materiality Assessment Is an Art, Not a Science: Selecting ESG Topics For Sustainability Reports. California Management Review, 65(1), 64-90.

Gong, M., Simpson, A., Koh, L., & Tan, K. H. (2018). Inside out: The Interrelationships pf Sustainable Performance Metrics and Its Effect on Business Decision Making: Theory and Practice. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 128, 155-166.

Gray, R., Brennan, A., & Malpas, J. (2014). New Accounts: Toward a Reframing of Social Accounting. In Accounting Forum, 38(4), 258–273.

Haaker, A. and Freiberg, J. (2021), Empfehlungen des Sustainable-Finance-Beirate?, NWB Internationale Rechnungslegung, 17(4), 120-121.

Ives, C. D., Freeth, R., & Fischer, J. (2020). Inside-Out Sustainability: The Neglect of Inner Worlds. Ambio, 49, 208-217.

Joly, H. (2021). Creating a Meaningful Corporate Purpose. Harvard Business Review.

Kurniawan, E., & Astuti, R. (2021). Pengaruh Corporate Governance, Kepemilikan Institusional, Leverage dan Growth Terhadap Tingkat Materialitas Sustainability Report. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 3(1), 72-90.

La Torre, M., Sabelfeld, S., Blomkvist, M., & Dumay, J. (2020). Rebuilding Trust: Sustainability and Non-Financial Reporting and the European Union Regulation. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5), 701-725.

Masiero, E., Arkhipova, D., Massaro, M., & Bagnoli, C. (2020). Corporate Accountability and Stakeholder Connectivity. A Case Study. Meditari Accountancy Research, 28(5), 803-831.

Meutia, I., Kartasari, S. F., Yusrianti, H., & Yaacob, Z. (2022). Evolution of Sustainability Reporting Research: Evidence from Indonesia (A Systematic Literature Review). Indonesian Journal of Sustainability Accounting and Management, 6(1), 50-70.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mio, C., Fasan, M., & Costantini, A. (2020). Materiality in Integrated and Sustainability Reporting: A Paradigm Shift? Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(1), 306-320.

Mysaka, H., & Derun, I. (2022). GRI 400 as a Contemporary tool to Increase Trust in Corporate Social Responsibility. Calitatea, 23(187), 256-270.

Oll, J., Spandel, T., Schiemann, F., & Akkermann, J. (2025). The Concept of Materiality in Sustainability Reporting: From Essential Contestation to Research Opportunities. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, 16(2), 321-350.

Pimentel, E., Cho, C.H. and Bothello, J. (2023), “The Blind Spots of Interdisciplinarity in Addressing Grand Challenges”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 93, 102475.

Qian, W., Tilt, C., & Belal, A. (2021). Social and Environmental Accounting in Developing Countries: Contextual Challenges and Insights. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 34(5), 1021-1050.

Raco, J. (2010). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Jenis, Karakteristik, dan Keunggulannya. Grasindo

Raghavan, K. (2022). ESG Reporting Impact on Accounting, Finance. Journal of Global Awareness, 3(1), 9.

Rouen, E., Sachdeva, K., & Yoon, A. (2023). The Evolution of ESG Reports and the Role of Voluntary Standards. Available at SSRN 4227934.

Sany, S., Novica, C., & Valentina, C. (2024). Do Board Multiple Directorships and ESG Score Drive Firm Value? Study of Non-Financial Companies in Thailand. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 26(1), 67-76.

Schiehll, E., & Kolahgar, S. (2021). Financial Materiality in the Informativeness Of Sustainability Reporting. Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(2), 840-855.

Sebrina, N., Taqwa, S., Afriyenti, M., & Septiari, D. (2023). Analysis of sustainability reporting quality and Corporate Social Responsibility on Companies Listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. Cogent Business & Management, 10(1), 2157975.

Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. S. (2022). Understanding the Business Relevance of ESG Issues. Journal of Financial Reporting, 7(2), 207-212.

Torelli, R., Balluchi, F., & Furlotti, K. (2020). The Materiality Assessment and Stakeholder Engagement: A Content Analysis of Sustainability Reports. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(2), 470-484.

Torrecchia, P. (2013). Social Accounting. In: Idowu, S.O., Capaldi, N., Zu, L., Gupta, A.D. (eds) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility, 2167 – 2172. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28036-8_191.

Triyanto. (2017). Indonesian Multiculturalism: Risks and Challenges. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Science (IJRES), 5(4), 44–49.

Unerman, J., & Zappettini, F. (2014). Incorporating Materiality Considerations into Analyses of Absence from Sustainability Reporting. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 34(3), 172-186.

Wagenhofer, A. (2024). Sustainability Reporting: A Financial Reporting Perspective. Accounting in Europe, 21(1), 1-13.

Young-Ferris, A., & Roberts, J. (2023). ‘Looking for Something That Isn’t There’: A Case Study of an Early Attempt at ESG Integration in Investment Decision Making. European Accounting Review, 32(3), 717-744.

Zharfpeykan, R., & Askarany, D. (2023). Sustainability Reporting and Organisational Factors. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 16(3), 163.

Downloads

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

Cahyandari, E., & Hermawan, M. S. (2025). Outside-In and Inside-Out Perspectives: An Analysis of ESG’s Social Dimension in Indonesian Air Navigation Company. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan, 27(2), 153–164. https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.27.2.153-164