Rigour in Qualitative Studies: Are we on track?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9744/jak.22.2.47-58

Keywords:

qualitative study, research quality, research method, rigour

Abstract

Prior research has explored qualitative studies in relation to the paradigms used. This paper enriches the literature by investigating the quality of qualitative studies in relation to the data collection method and participants' selection. In this study, we collected SNA qualitative paper proceedings from 2007 to 2017. Guided by the minimum criteria of the data collection method described in the literature review sections, we analyze those proceedings. We found the three most common methods used in the studies: interview, observation, and documentation. The majority of the paper clearly stated their data collection method. However, only a minority of them provides a clear description of how the data were collected and how to obtain participants/data used in their studies and why invite dthem in the research. Thus, it is suggested that researchers provide a detail explanation of their methods to show the rigour of the study that they conducted

Author Biographies

Ani Wilujeng Suryani, Universitas Negeri Malang

Accounting department

Helianti Utami, Universitas Negeri Malang

Accounting Department

References

Berg, B. L. (2001). Qualitative research methods for the social sciences (Fourth Edi). Allyn and Bacon.

Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (Fourth Edi). Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A. &, & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods. Oxford University Press.

Carnegie, G. D., & Potter, B. N. (2018). Publishing patterns in specialist accounting history journals in English language. The Academy of Accounting Historians, 27(2), 177–198.

Carter, S. M., & Little, M. (2007). Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 1316–1328.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (Third Edit). London Sage.

Darmayasa, I. N., & Aneswari, Y. R. (2015). Paradigma interpretif pada penelitian akuntansi Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 6(3), 341–511. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18202/jamal.2015.12.6028

Decrop, A. (1999). Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tourism Management, 20(1), 157–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00102-2

Denzin, N. K. (1978). The Research Act: A theoretical Introduction to Sociological Methods. New York: McGraw Hills.

Doolin, B. (1996). Alternative views of case research in information systems. Australian Journal of Information Systems, 3, 21–29.

Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory building from cases: opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

Ekasari, K. (2014). Menerawang Riset Akuntansi di Pendidikan Vokasi di Masa Depan. Prosiding Simposium Nasional Akuntansi Vokasi 3, 404–414.

Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen. (2008). Qualitative methods in business research. London: Sage.

Flick, U. (2008). Managing quality in qualitative research. London: Sage.

Flick, U., Kardorff, E. V., & Steinke, I. (2004). A companion to Qualitative Research. Sage Publications.

Grady, J. (2008). Visual research at the crossroads. Qualitative Social Research, 9(3).

Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82.

Hermanowicz, J. C. (2002). The great interview: 25 strategies for studying people in bed. Qualitative Sociology, 25(4), 479–499.

Irani, Z., Ezingeard, J., Grieve, R., & Race, P. (1999). A case study strategy as part of an information systems research methodology: a critique. The International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 12(2), 190–198.

Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (Second Edi). Pearson, Sydney.

Kawulich, B. (2005). Participant observation as a data collection method. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforchung, 6(2), 43.

Lukka, K., & Kasanen, E. (1996). Is accounting a global or a local discipline? evidence from major research journals. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21(7–8), 755–773. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(96)00020-7

Mason, M. (2010). Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Sozialforchung, 11(3), 8.

McDonald, V. (2010). Before-and-after case study design. In A.J. Mills, G. Eurepos, & E. Wiebe (Eds). Encyclopedia of Case Study Research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication, Inc.

Merriam, & Tisdell. (2016). Qualitative research: a guide to design and implementation (Fourth Edi). United States of America: Jossey-Bass: a Wiley Brand.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook (Second Edi). London: Sage Publications.

Myers, M. D. (2009). Qualitative research in business and management. London: Sage Publications.

Myers, M. D., & Newman, M. (2007). The qualitative interview in Is research: examining the craft. Information and Organization, 17, 2–26.

Naela, P., Thapa, S., & Boyce, C. (2006). Preparing a case study: a guide for designing and conducting a case study for evaluation input. Ghana: Pathfinder International.

Neuman, W. (2003). Social research methods: qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Pearson Education.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (Third Edit). Sage Publications.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (Fourth Edi). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Punch, K. F. (1999). Introduction to social research: quantitative and qualitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, London: Sage Publications.

Ritchie, J., & Lewis, J. (2003). Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage Publications.

S., P. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Schensul, J. J., & LeCompte, M. D. (2013). Essential ethnographic methods: a mixed methods approach. Ethnographer’s toolkit, book 3 (Second Edi). Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.

Suyunus, M. (2012). Ketika Paradigma Positif Mendampingi Paradigma Non-Positif Dalam Riset Akuntansi. Ekuitas: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Keuangan, 16(4), 409–432.

Walsham, G. (1995). Interpretive case studies in IS research: nature and method. European Journal of Information Systems, 4, 74–81.

Wolcott, H. F. (1992). Posturing in qualitative inquiry. In M.D. LeCompte, W.L. Millroy, & J. Preissle (Eds), the handbook of qualitative research in education. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: design and methods (Third Edit). Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications.

Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-30