Women Directors and Firm Profitability: The Role of Corporate Environmental Responsibility Engagement
Keywords:Upper Echelon Theory, Sustainability, Women Directors, Governance and Gender, Corporate Environmental Responsibility Engagement
Women in the professional world are still experiencing inequality, discrimination, and obstacles in achieving top management positions. The role of women in improving the company's financial performance is still being debated to this day. This study aims to investigate the role of women directors in 129 manufacturing companies in Indonesia from 2015 to 2019. The data obtained were analyzed using structural equation modelling – partial least square (SEM-PLS). This study found that corporate environmental responsibility engagement did not mediate the relationship between women directors and firm profitability. This study found a significant negative relationship between women directors and corporate environmental responsibility but a significant positive influence between corporate environmental responsibility engagement and firm profitability. However, this study found no significant relationship between women directors and profitability.
Adusei, M. & Obeng, E. Y. T. (2019). Board gender diversity and the capital structure of microfinance institutions: A global analysis. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 71, pp. 258–269. doi: 10.1016/j. qref.2018.09.006.
Alazzani, A., Hassanein, A. & Aljanadi, Y. (2017). Impact of gender diversity on social and environmental performance: evidence from Malaysia. Corporate Governance International Journal of Business in Society, vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 266–283. doi: 10.1108/CG-12-2015-0161.
Angel J. J. & Rivoli, P. (1997). Does Ethical Investing Impose a Cost Upon the Firm? A Theoretical Perspective. The Journal of Invest¬ing, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 57 LP – 61. doi: 10.3905/joi. 1997.57.
Azka, R. M. Kementerian Erick Thohir Targetkan 15 Persen Direksi BUMN Perempuan. 2021. https://ekonomi.bisnis.com/read/2021030 9/9/1365676/kementerian-erick-thohir-targetkan-15-persen-direksi-bumn-perempuan. (accessed May 09, 2022).
Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1173–1182.
Bernardi R. A. & Arnold Sr, D. F. (1997). An examination of moral development within public accounting by gender, staff level, and firm. Contemporary Accounting Research, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 653–668.
Bertrand, M., Black, S. E., Jensen, S. & Lleras-Muney, A. (2019). Breaking the glass ceiling? The effect of board quotas on female labour market outcomes in Norway. The Review of Economic Studies, vol. 86, no. 1, pp. 191–239.
Birindelli, G., Iannuzzi, A. P. & Savioli, M. (2019). The impact of women leaders on environmental performance: Evidence on gender diversity in banks. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Manag, vol. 26, no. 6, pp. 1485–1499, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1762.
Bowen, H., Social responsibilities of the businessman, New York, Harper, 1953.
Broadstock, D. C., Matousek, R., Meyer, M. & Tzeremes, N. G. (2020). Does corporate social responsibility impact firms’ innovation capacity? The indirect link between environmental & social governance implementation and innovation performance. Journal of Business Research, vol. 119, pp. 99–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.014.
Carbonero, F., Devicienti, F., Manello, A. & Vannoni, D. (2021). Women on board and firm export attitudes: Evidence from Italy. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, vol. 192, pp. 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.10.011.
Cavero-Rubio, J. A., Collazo-Mazón, A. & Amorós-Martínez, A. (2019). Public recognition of gender equality in the workplace and its influence on firms’ performance. Women's Studies International Forum, vol. 76, p. 102273, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102273.
Chen, S., Wang, Y., Albitar, K. & Huang, Z. (2021). Does ownership concentration affect corporate environmental responsibility engagement? The mediating role of corporate leverage. Borsa Istanbul Review, vol. 21, pp. S13–S24. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2021.02.001.
Comi, S., Grasseni, M., Origo, F. & Pagani, L. (2019). Where Women Make a Difference: Gender Quotas and Firms’ Performance in Three European Countries. ILR Review, vol. 73, no. 3, pp. 768–793. doi: 10.1177/0019793919846450.
Damagum, Y. M., Oba, V. C., Chima, E. I. & Ibikunle, J. (2014). Women in corporate boards and financial reporting credibility: Evidence from Nigeria. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Management Research, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–8.
Đặng, R., Houanti, L., Reddy, K. & Simioni, M. (2020). Does board gender diversity influence firm profitability? A control function approach. Economic Modelling, vol. 90, pp. 168–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2020.05.009.
De Mendonca, T. R. & Zhou, Y. (2019). Environ-mental Performance, Customer Satisfaction, and Profitability: A Study among Large U.S. Companies. Sustainability , vol. 11, no. 19. doi: 10.3390/su11195418.
Diamantopoulos, A., Schlegelmilch, B. B., Sinkovics, R. R. & Bohlen, G. M. (2003). Can socio-demographics still play a role in profiling green consumers? A review of the evidence and an empirical investigation. Journal of Business Research, vol. 56, no. 6, pp. 465–480.
Diarsi, M. (1996). It’s Not Only to Say to Patriarchy: Feminism in Women’s Movement in Indonesia 1990s. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 158–169.
Dobbin, F., Schrage, D. & Kalev, A. (2015). Rage against the Iron Cage: The Varied Effects of Bureaucratic Personnel Reforms on Diversity. American Sociological Review, vol. 80, no. 5, pp. 1014–1044. doi: 10.1177/0003122415 596416.
Eagly, A. H., Johannesen-Schmidt, M. C. & van Engen, M. L. (2003). Transformational, transactional, and laissez-faire leadership styles: A meta-analysis comparing women and men. Psychological Bulletin, vol. 129, no. 4. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.4.569.
Elkington, J., Cannibals with Forks : The Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business, 1997.
Gerdiansyah. 47 Perusahaan Manufaktur Sumbang Polusi Udara di Jakarta, Akurat.co, 2019 (accessed May 09, 2022).
Glass, C., Cook, A., and Ingersoll, A. R. (2016). Do Women Leaders Promote Sustainability? Analyzing the Effect of Corporate Governance Composition on Environmental Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 25, no. 7, pp. 495–511.
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M. & Ringle, C. M. (2018). The Results of PLS-SEM Article information. European Business Review, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 2–24.
Hambrick D. C. & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper Echelons: The Organization as a Reflection of Its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 193–206. doi: 10.5465/ amr.1984.4277628.
Hambrick, D. C. (2007). Upper Echelons Theory: An Update. Academy of Management Review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 334–343. doi: 10.2307/ 20159303.
Hilman H. & Kaliappen, N. (2014). Market Orientation Practices and Effects on Organizational Performance: Empirical Insight from Malaysian Hotel Industry. SAGE Open, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 2158244014553590. doi: 10.1177/21582 44014553590.
Himmelweit, S. (2000). Inside the household: From labour to care. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Julizaerma M. K. & Sori, Z. M. (2012). Gender Diversity in the Boardroom and Firm Performance of Malaysian Public Listed Companies. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 65, no. ICIBSoS, pp. 1077–1085. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.374.
Khan, S. N., Hussain, R. I., Maqbool, M. Q., Ali, E. I. E. & Numan, M. (2019). The mediating role of innovation between corporate governance and organizational performance: Moderating role of innovative culture in Pakistan textile sector. Cogent Business & Management.
Khilji, S. E. & Pumroy, K. H. (2019). We are strong and we are resilient: Career experiences of women engineers. Gender, Work and Organization, vol. 26, no. 7, pp. 1032–1052. https://doi. org/10.1111/gwao.12322.
Khojastehpour M. & Johns, R. (2014). The effect of environmental CSR issues on corporate/brand reputation and corporate profitability. European Business Review, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 330–339. doi: 10.1108/EBR-03-2014-0029.
Kim, N. L. T., Duvernay, D. & Le Thanh, H. (2021). Determinants of financial performance of listed firms manufacturing food products in Vietnam: regression analysis and Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition analysis. Journal of Economics and Development, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 267–283. doi: 10.1108/JED-09-2020-0130.
Kimball, A., Palmer, D. & Marquis, C. (2012). The Impact of Women Top Managers and Directors on Corporate Environmental Performance. SSRN Electron. J. doi: 10.2139/ssrn. 2211826.
Kusumastuti, S., Supatmi, S. & Sastra, P. (2007). Pengaruh Board Diversity Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan Dalam Perspektif Corporate Governance. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 88–98.
Lafuente, E. & Vaillant, Y. (2019). Balance rather than critical mass or tokenism. International Journal of Manpower, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 894–916. doi: 10.1108/IJM-10-2017-0268.
Laili M. H. & Damayanti, A. (2018). Kesenjangan Upah Antargender di Indonesia: Bukti Empiris di Sektor Manufaktur. Jurnal Eko¬nomi dan Pembangunan Indonesia., pp. 1–21. doi: 10.21002/jepi.v0i0.1096.
Li, J., Zhao, F., Chen, S., Jiang, W., Liu, T. & Shi, S. (2017). Gender Diversity on Boards and Firms’ Environmental Policy. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 306–315, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1918.
Li, Z., Liao, G., & Albitar, K. (2020). Does corporate environmental responsibility engagement affect firm value? The mediating role of corporate innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 1045–1055. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2416.
Liu, C. (2018). Are women greener? Corporate gender diversity and environmental violations. Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 52, pp. 118–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2018.08. 004.
Liu, N., Tang, S.-Y., Lo, C. W.-H. & Zhan, X. (2016). Stakeholder demands and corporate environmental coping strategies in China. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 165, pp. 140–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.027.
Lloret, A. (2016). Modeling corporate sustai¬nability strategy. Journal of Business Research, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 418–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.06.047.
MacKinnon, D. P., Lockwood, C. M., Hoffman, J. M., West, S. G. & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 83.
Maheshwari, M. & Lenka, U. (2022). An integrated conceptual framework of the glass ceiling effect,” Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 372–400, doi: 10.1108/JOEPP-06-2020-0098.
Matsa D. A. & Miller, A. R. (2013). A Female Style in Corporate Leadership? Evidence from Quotas. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 136–169. doi: 10. 1257/app.5.3.136.
Nadeem, M., Bahadar, S., Gull, A. A. & Iqbal, U. (2020). Are women eco-friendly? Board gender diversity and environmental innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 3146–3161. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2563.
Ntim C. G. & Soobaroyen, T. (2013). Corporate governance and performance in socially respon-sible corporations: New empirical insights from a Neo‐Institutional framework. Corporate Governance: An International Review., vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 468–494.
Oakley, J. G. (2000). Gender-based Barriers to Senior Management Positions: Understanding the Scarcity of Female CEOs. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 321–334. doi: 10.1023/A:1006226129868.
Peng, B., Tu, Y., Elahi, E. & Wei, G. (2018). Extended Producer Responsibility and corporate performance: Effects of environmental regulation and environmental strategy. Journal of Environmental Management, vol. 218, pp. 181–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.068.
Poletti-Hughes, J. & Briano-Turrent, G. C. (2019). Gender diversity on the board of direc¬tors and corporate risk: A behavioural agency theory perspective. International Review of Financial Analysis, vol. 62, pp. 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.irfa.2019.02.004.
Post, C. & Byron, K. (2015). Women on boards and firm financial performance: a metaanalysis. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 58, no. 5, pp. 1546–1571.
Post, C., Rahman, N. & McQuillen, C. (2015). From Board Composition to Corporate Environmental Performance Through Sustainability-Themed Alliances. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 130, no. 2, pp. 423–435. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2231-7.
Pucheta-Martínez M. C. & Gallego-Álvarez, I. (2019). An international approach of the relationship between board attributes and the disclosure of corporate social responsibility issues. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 612–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1707.
Ramadhani, P. I. OJK: Kontribusi Perempuan di Jajaran Komisaris dan Direksi Masih di Bawah 50 Persen. 2021.
Ratmono D. & Sholihin, M. Analisis SEM-PLS dengan Warp PLS 3.0 untuk hubungan non¬linier dalam penelitian sosial dan bisnis, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2013.
Reguera-Alvarado, N., de Fuentes, P. & Laf¬farga, J. (2017). Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 141, no. 2, pp. 337–350. doi: 10.1007/s10551-015-2735-9.
Rose, C. (2007). Does female board representation influence firm performance? The Danish evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 404–413.
Russo, M. V. & Fouts, V. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 534–559. doi: 10.2307/257052.
Sakina A. I. & D. H. S. A. (2017). Menyoroti Budaya Patriarki di Indonesia. Share Soc. Work J., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 71–80.
Sattar, M., Biswas, P. K. & Roberts, H. (2021). Private firm performance: do women directors matter?. Meditari Accountancy Research, vol. ahead-of-print, no. ahead-of-print, doi: 10.1108/ MEDAR-03-2021-1233.
Shad, M. K., Lai, F. W., Fatt, C. L., Klemeš, J. J. & Bokhari, A. (2019). Integrating sus-tainability reporting into enterprise risk mana-gement and its relationship with business performance: A conceptual framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 208, pp. 415–425. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.120.
Shahab, Y., Ntim, C. G., Chengang, Y., Ullah, F. & Fosu, S. (2018). Environmental policy, environmental performance, and financial distress in China: Do top management team characteristics matter?. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 27, no. 8, pp. 1635–1652. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2229.
Singh, A. K. Singhania, S. & Sardana, V. (2019). Do women on boards affect firm’s financial performance? Evidence from Indian IPO firms. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 53–68.
Stephanie, B., Bianchi, L. & Berman, C. (2019). Gender and governance of global value chains: Promoting the rights of women workers. International Labour Review., vol. 158, no. 4, pp. 729–752. https://doi.org/10.1111/ilr.12150.
Trumpp C. & Guenther, T. (2017). Too Little or too much? Exploring U-shaped Relationships between Corporate Environmental Perfor-mance and Corporate Financial Performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1900.
Tsendsuren, C.. Yadav, P. L., Han, S. H. & Mun, S. (2021). The effect of corporate environmental responsibility and religiosity on corporate cash holding decisions and profitability: Evidence from the United States’ policies for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 987–1000. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2189.
Uyar, A., Kilic, M., Koseoglu, M. A., Kuzey, C. & Karaman, A. S. (2020). The link among board characteristics, corporate social responsibility performance, and financial performance: Evidence from the hospitality and tourism industry. Tourism Management Perspectives, vol. 35, p. 100714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2020.100714.
Valls Martínez, M. del C., & Cruz Rambaud, S. (2019). Women on corporate boards and firm’s financial performance. Women’s Studies Inter-national Forum, 76(June), 102251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2019.102251
Walls, J. L., Berrone, P. & Phan, P. H. (2012). Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, no. 8, pp. 885–913. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1952.
Wynn, A. T. (2019). Pathways toward Change: Ideologies and Gender Equality in a Silicon Valley Technology Company. Gender & Society, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 106–130. doi: 10.1177/0891243219876271.
Xie, J., Nozawa, W. & Managi, S. (2020). The role of women on boards in corporate environmental strategy and financial performance: A global outlook. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2044–2059. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1945.
Xing, L., Gonzalez, A. & Sila, V. (2021). Does cooperation among women enhance or impede firm performance?. The British Accounting Review, vol. 53, no. 4, p. 100936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2020.100936.
Xu, M., Albitar, V. & Li, Z. Z. (2020). Does corporate financialization affect EVA? Early evidence from China. Green Finance, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 392–408. doi: 10.3934/GF.2020021.
Xu, Q., Lu, Y., Lin, H. & Li, B. (2021). Does corporate environmental responsibility (CER) affect corporate financial performance? Evidence from the global public construction firms. Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 315, no. January, p. 128131. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021. 128131.
Yang, P., Riepe, J., Moser, K., Pull, K. & Ter¬jesen, S. (2019). Women directors, firm performance, and firm risk: A causal perspective. The Leadership Quarterly., vol. 30, no. 5, p. 101297. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.05.004.
Yasmin, A. A., Krismantari, I. & Tamara, N. Kasus Aice: dilema buruh perempuan di Indonesia dan pentingnya kesetaraan gender di lingkungan kerja. The Conversation, 2020. https://theconversation.com/kasus-aice-dilema-buruh-perempuan-di-indonesia-dan-pentingnya-kesetaraan-gender-di-lingkungan-kerja-133010 (accessed May 09, 2022).
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain the copyright and publishing right, and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) followingthe publication of the article, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).<a href="http://creativecommons.org/lice