Discretionary Accounting Choice and Management Opportunistic Behavior to Manage Income

Theresia Trisanti


Income smoothing (IS) practice is "the smoothing of fluctuations company income levels that are considered normal for company". IS manipulation has a clear goal, which is to generate income flows that continue increase stably. There are several ways that companies can use to do IS practice for example: changes in accounting methods. In this research, income smoothing practices of Indonesian listed manufacturing firms were detected through empirical tests using changes in discretionary accounting (DAC). Samples of listed manufacturing companies classified as smoothing and non-smoothing using Moses smoothing behavior index. The results show that the possible motivation of DAC transactions is income smoothing. Two independent variables such as institutional ownership and external audit quality have a significant positive effect on IS practice but the company size has no influence on IS practice.


discretionary accounting changes, income smoothing practices, institutional ownership, external audit quality, type of industry.

Full Text:



  1. Abdullah, S. N., Ismail, K. N. I. K. and Lode, N. A. (2002). Disclosure of Extraordinary Items and Income Smoothing Behaviour in Malaysia. Jurnal Pengurusan, 21, 57-75.

  2. Acharya, V. V. and Lambrecht, B. M. 2015. A theory of income smoothing when insiders know more than outsiders. The Review of Financial Studies, 28, 9. doi: 10.1093/rfs/hhv026

  3. Aljifri, K. (2007). Measurement and Motivations of Earnings Management: A Critical Perspective. Journal of Accounting, Business and Management, 14.

  4. Allayannis, G. and Simko, P. J. 2009. Earnings smoothing, analyst following, and firm value. Analyst Following, and Firm Value (August 25, 2009).

  5. Athanasakou, V. E., Strong, N. C. and Walker, M. (2007). Classificatory income smoothing: The impact of a change in regime of reporting financial performance. Journal of Accounting and Public policy, 26(4), 387-435. doi:

  6. Atik, A. 2009. Detecting income-smoothing behaviors of Turkish listed companies through empirical tests using discretionary accounting changes. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 20, 5. doi: 1016/

  7. Berloffa, G. and Modena, F. (2013). Income shocks, coping strategies, and consumption smoothing: An application to Indonesian data. Journal of Asian Economics, 24, 158-171. doi:

  8. Chung, K. H. and Zhang, H. (2011). Corporate governance and institutional ownership. Journal of financial and quantitative analysis, 46(1), 247-273. doi: s002 2109010000682

  9. Copeland, R. M. and Licastro, R. D. 1968. A note on income smoothing. The Accounting Review, 43, 3.

  10. Dao, M. and Pham, T. (2014). Audit tenure, auditor specialization and audit report lag. Managerial Auditing Journal, 29(6), 490-512. doi:

  11. Elgers, P. T., Pfeiffer Jr, R. J. and Porter, S. L. (2003). Anticipatory income smoothing: a re-examination. Journal of Accounting and Eco-nomics, 35(3), 405-422. doi: 1016/S0165-4101(03)00039-9

  12. Fama, E. (2012). Agency problems and the theory of the firm. In The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader. Third Edition. doi:

  13. Gaa, J., and Dunmore, P. September, 2007. The ethics of earnings management. Chartered Accountants Journal of New Zealand, 86, 60–62. 209683743?accountid=14549%5Cn

  14. Gaganis, C., Hasan, I. and Pasiouras, F. (2016). Regulations, institutions and income smoothing by managing technical reserves: International evidence from the insurance industry. Omega, 59, 113-129. doi: http://doi. org/10.1016/

  15. Gill-de-Albornoz, B., and Markarian, G. 2010. Income Smoothing and Idiosyncratic Volatility. Working Paper, 1–51. new/images/IEAF/FEF/los-premios-de-investigacion/premios 2012/INCOME.pdf

  16. Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R. and Rajgopal, S. (2005). The economic implications of corporate financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1-3), 3-73. doi: http://doi. org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2005.01.002

  17. Habib, A. 2005. Firm-specific determinants of income smoothing in Bangladesh: An empirical evaluation. Advances in International Accounting, 18. doi: S0897-3660(05)18003-9

  18. Heflin, F., Kwon, S. S. and Wild, J. J. (2002). Accounting choices: variation in managerial opportunism. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 29(7‐8), 1047-1078. doi:

  19. Herrmann, D. and Inoue, T. (1996). Income smoothing and incentives by operating condition: an empirical test using depreciation changes in Japan. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 5(2), 161-177.

  20. Iatridis, G. 2010. International Financial Reporting Standards and the quality of financial statement information. International review of financial analysis, 19, 3. doi: 10.1016/j.irfa.2010.02.004

  21. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305-360. doi:

  22. Jensen, M., and Meckling, W. (2012). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. In The Economic Nature of the Firm: A Reader, Third Edition. 511817410.023

  23. Karmon, D. J. and Lubwama, C. W. (1997). An events-study approach to detecting income-smoothing activities: Some evidence from multinational corporations. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 6(1), 75-95. doi: S1061-9518(97)90013-6

  24. Koch, B. S. (2010). Smoothing: Experiment, 56(3), 574–586.

  25. Kocmanová, A., Hrebicek, J., and Docekalová, M. 2011. Corporate Governance and Sustainability. Econ Manag, 16, 543–549. http://doi. org/10.4324/9780203390122

  26. Koh, P.-S. (2005). Institutional ownership and income smoothing: Australian evidence. Account-ing Research Journal, 18(2), 93-110. doi:

  27. Krishnan, G. V. 2003. Does Big 6 Auditor Industry Expertise, (1991), 1–16. http://doi. org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.s-1.1

  28. Low, M., Davey, H. and Hooper, K. 2008. Accounting scandals, ethical dilemmas and educational challenges. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19, 2. doi: 1016/

  29. Luqman, R. A., and Shahzad, F. 2012. An Association between Income Smoothing, Income Tax And Profitability Ratios in Karachi Stock Exchange (An Empirical Investigation). Interdiciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 3(9), 986–991.

  30. Lusi, D. and Swastika, T. (2013). Corporate governance, firm size, and earning management: Evidence in Indonesia stock exchange. Journal of Business and Management, 10(4), 77-82.

  31. Morck, R. and Yeung, B. 2003. Agency problems in large family business groups. Entrepreneurship theory and practice, 27, 4. doi:

  32. Moses, O. D. 1987. Income smoothing and incentives: Empirical tests using accounting changes. Accounting Review. http://web.a. gr4003&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3Fdirect%3Dtrue%26scope%3Dsite%26db%3Dbth%26AN%3D4478528%26msid%3D-427778771&hid= 4207&vid=0&bdata=Jmxhbmc9cHQtYnImc2l0ZT1laG9zdC1s

  33. Namazi, M. and Khansalar, E. 2011. An inves-tigation of the income smoothing behavior of growth and value firms (case study: Tehran stock exchange market). International Business Research, 4, 4. doi: 10.5539/ibr.v4n4p84

  34. Nelson, M. W. and Tayler, W. B. 2007. Infor-mation pursuit in financial statement analysis: Effects of choice, effort, and reconciliation. The Accounting Review, 82, 3. doi:

  35. Nkundabanyanga, S. K. and Sserwanga, A. (2011). Firm Risk Profile, Agency Incentives and Corporate Performance: Corporate Governance Perspective of Uganda. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 7(3), 239.

  36. Prencipe, A., Bar‐Yosef, S., Mazzola, P. and Pozza, L. 2011. Income smoothing in family‐controlled companies: Evidence from Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 19, 6. doi: 2011.00856.x

  37. Rezaee, Z. 2005. Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16, 3. doi:

  38. Richardson, G. D. 1989. Discussion of “Timeliness of financial reporting, the firm size effect, and stock price reactions to annual earnings announcements”. Contemporary Accounting Research, 5, 2. doi: 1111/j.1911-3846.1989.tb00722.x

  39. Rydqvist, K., Schwartz, S. T. and Spizman, J. D. (2014). The tax benefit of income smoothing. Journal of Banking and Finance, 38, 78-88. doi: - 2013.09.017

  40. Saudagaran, S. M. and Sepe, J. F. (1996). Replication of moses’income smoothing tests with canadian and uk data: a note. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 23(8), 1219-1222. doi:

  41. Schmidt, J. J. and Wilkins, M. S. (2013). Bringing Darkness to Light: The Influence of Auditor Quality and Audit Committee Expertise on the Timeliness of Financial Statement Restatement Disclosures. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 32(1). doi:

  42. Shanikat, M. and Abbadi, S. S. (2011). Assessment of corporate governance in Jordan:

    An empirical study. Australasian Accounting, Business and Finance Journal, 5(3), 93-106.

  43. Srinidhi, B., Ronen, J. and Maindiratta, A. 2001. Market imperfections as the cause of accounting income smoothing—the case of differential capital access. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 17, 3.

  44. Trisanti, T. (2013). The Effect of Non-recurring Item Transactions on the Possibility of Firms to Smooth Income: the Case of Indonesian Listed Firms. Indonesian Journal of Accounting and Auditing, 17(2), 123-134.

  45. Tucker, J. W., and Zarowin, P. A. 2006. Earnings Informativeness ?, 81(1), 251–270.

  46. Van Tendeloo, B. and Vanstraelen, A. (2005). Earnings management under German GAAP versus IFRS. European Accounting Review, 14(1), 155-180. doi: 0963818042000338988

  47. Vyas, D. (2011). The timeliness of accounting write‐downs by US financial institutions during the financial crisis of 2007–2008. Journal of accounting research, 49(3), 823-860. doi:

  48. White, G. E. (1970). Discretionary accounting decisions and income normalization. Journal of accounting research, 8(2), 260-273.

  49. Zhou, J., and Elder, R. 2001. Audit Firm Size , Industry Specialization and Earnings Mana-gement by Initial Public Offering Firms. State University of New York at Binghamton, (315).

  50. Zhou, W. and Kapoor, G. (2011). Detecting evolutionary financial statement fraud. Decision Support Systems, 50(3), 570-575. doi:


Template for Preparing Article for JAK

The Journal is published by The Institute of Research & Community Outreach - Petra Christian University. It available online supported by Directorate General of Higher Education - Ministry of National Education - Republic of Indonesia.

©All right reserved 2018. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, ISSN: 1411-0288, e-ISSN: 2338-8137

click tracking
View My Stats